Author Archives: Christine Niver

The Present: Word Pollution Overload

Leave a reply

Welcome to this week’s Bill Harvey Blog.
July 31, 2026

MIND MAGIC / MIND EXPERIMENTS Book Excerpt Series: Part 4

Read Part 3 

How the tonnage of words and other input has increased past the overload point, causing hysterical imitation in the place of real life.

Meditation as accelerated information-processing

Information Overload: A cybernetic explanation for the state of the world (1)

Over millennia, up to about 300,000 years ago, we humans evolved a neuronic net, which we call a cerebral cortex. We are still learning how to use this new facility, and currently, it is running amok and hypnotizing us, due apparently to an overload of “question-producing” sensory input per average second.

This overload appears to have been brought about by the successive waves of the media revolution, which began with the printing press and have reached tidal wave proportions with today’s Internet, television, radio, magazines, newspapers, books, records, outdoor signs, movies, plays and so on.

The world was very different 600 years ago. We estimate that about seven weeks’ worth of sensory “question-producing” stimuli 600 years ago is what we now get in a day—about fifty times the pressure to learn and adapt.

Just as an “Ice Age” appeared to stimulate humans to discover “travel” and master fire, this media revolution, while it has paralyzed the brains of our leaders as well as ourselves, also appears to be a stimulus for humans—to evolve the capacity to remain focused through complexity.

Cybernetically contemplating the brain

In order to appreciate how “question-producing” sensory overload can have such a powerful effect, one must cybernetically contemplate the brain. The neuronic net we call the cerebral cortex contains about 80 billion neurons, each capable of relating in many different ways to thousands of other neurons around it. (2)

Let us visualize this as transparent, as if it were a force field rather than matter, so that we can look through it in our minds. When sensory input comes in, it moves from neuron to neuron. At each neuron, it encounters other information, and sometimes, the contact results in a cognitive association between the new input and a memory.

Brain researchers can tell that the incoming sensory data is “filtered” (as if through a grid) as it moves in through layers of neurons, each of which checks the data from slightly different “viewpoints.”

This is how the brain updates many of its files based on each new piece of data passing through. Something we see on the street may trigger “notes to oneself” in several different “files” without our being consciously aware of all this (because there is so much going on so fast inside and outside).

Because of the many logical connections between each bit of incoming sensory stimuli and each bit we have already stored as memory, a cyclopean computer update—the kind that would daunt human computer specialists— takes place in our brain each second our eyes are open on anything other than a totally familiar scene.

Yogis estimate that 70% of the energy we consume is consumed through the eyes.

Today’s media revolution proves that what we let into our eyes and ears is much more of a factor in our well-being than what we allow into our stomachs. We have gotten used to treating our precision electronic circuitry most carelessly, by feeding it sustained hyper-overload with scarcely a letup—as if our neuronic nets were more like Sherman tanks.

There’s your brain there every moment like a secretary tugging at your sleeve asking you where to file something, and your answer requires a decision. But meanwhile, outside your eyes—the world still wants you to do this and that (and it asks questions, too!).

Before the media revolution, people just took their time, thought things through pretty carefully and slowly, and worked out all the details. Today, there are too many details. The brain shifts into a different kind of functioning entirely.

The brain represses dissonance. It accepts that questions needn’t be answered. And it lets itself regard certain questions only long enough to identify them as having been looked at before; then it puts them away with a “characteristic-habitual-decision-feeling” as if the matter were solved…

We call this phenomenon “hasty closure”. In other words, we let ourselves fool ourselves into ignoring things we should be understanding because we “simply haven’t got time.” (Actually, we don’t know where to begin.)

A different kind of functioning entirely

When people are hypnotized by the things they are told, their resulting emotional motivations drive them at a hectic pace, precluding meditating on their own experience. They “click into Emergency Oversimplification Procedure”—another way humans can process information other than the way that is normally best.

In this emergency oversimplification procedure, our bio- computers follow a grosser logic. For one thing, in EOP, everything must be either black or white. And it must be decided immediately, based on precedent.

We also have little foresight in EOP. In meditation, we can see where things will lead years hence and so avoid entanglements we won’t want then. The mind has little agility for this maneuver in EOP.

Mind Experiment

  1. For one entire day, concentrate on not jumping to conclusions.
  2. Am I in EOP?

For one entire day, keep checking to make sure you’re not in EOP, and if you are, get yourself out of it.

Signs of EOP:

  • Black/white thinking
  • All force goes to precedent
  • Things you see are auto-categorized
  • Negative or no feeling
  • Speediness
  • Engaging in activities to get them out of the way

How to get out:

  • Breathe…
  • Let your body relax wherever it is holding tension.
  • Regain your sense of humor.
  • Change the scene for a moment.
  • Use your body (walk, go to the bathroom, etc.).
  • Remember your long-range objectives and how they translate to immediate goals in the NOW.
  • Remember your agreements.

But most of all, find out what YOU want to do NOW. Then, balance that with your agreements.

Let yourself enjoy a long, slow, new, creative approach to all situations. There’s no hurry.

  1. Cybernetic = from the Greek for “Helmsman.” The Science of Guidance Systems, human or otherwise.
  2. Most neurons can either “fire” or “not fire.” Some, called “microprocessors,” have a wider repertoire. However, even the two-way neurons can have a range of meanings depending upon which other neurons are firing.

Love to all,
Bill

 

Application of the Scientific Method to Personal Life

Leave a reply

Welcome to this week’s Bill Harvey Blog.
July 24, 2026

MIND MAGIC / MIND EXPERIMENTS Book Excerpt Series: Part 3

Read Part 2 

It all boils down to whose advice to follow?

In the usual unscientific approach to personal life, if someone gives you a piece of advice, you either believe it or disbelieve it. In the scientific approach to personal life, you neither believe it nor disbelieve it. What you might do is test it.

This also covers advice from “your own thoughts”. It even covers “advice” from “your own feelings”. In other words, your own feelings might steer you right, might steer you wrong—you can’t assume one or the other because there have always been instances of both. You can only “test” a particular feeling by seeing its results:

1) First in a simulation run in your head of what could happen if you were to “run with” this feeling;

2) Then, possibly, by “going with” the feeling in real Life and seeing what the consequences are.

So, it all boils down to whose advice to follow? There is the advice of the mind, the advice of the heart, the advice of the gut, the advice from others, the advice from books, memories, etc., etc.

The only way to know is to try experiments. Be sure you remember which advice you are testing at the moment, so you know why you are getting certain results (there is a tendency to forget).

Example:

Let’s say somebody, maybe a parent of yours, when you were small, said to you “Hey—dig it—unselfish actions pay back better.” Let’s say you had a flash of real under­standing and decided to try this advice. You would have found that it works.

In trying out this advice in practice, conscious of what you were doing and willing to see the advice succeed or fail in all objectivity, you were living that moment by the Scientific Method.

This is the way a “guru” lives each second, watching the evidence of experience very closely (inner and outer expe­rience), stepping back a pace from all the opinions.

The Guru has/is savoir-faire.

What impresses people about gurus? They seem to know how to do everything right, like certain fictional heroes, and people in history’s favor. This implies the existence of a Best Operating Procedure that they have discovered.

The thing about a guru is that he/she is watching very closely. This way, he/she learns. A flash to the wise is sufficient.

This is what neurosis is.

Neurosis is the mouse endlessly trying the dead end. Not learning. Living with unsatisfactory stuff in one’s Life per­manently, as if it inherently cannot be overcome.

Unlimited willingness to refine one’s position

In the usual unscientific approach to Life, one attempts to get one’s positions unshakably firm as soon as possible, and then defends against any changes to these positions with demonic energy.

In the scientific approach to Life, one is always eager to take one step further in any particular analysis.

Thus, one is always making provisional action decisions for this time, now; keeping an open mind about later; suspending belief and disbelief. One’s positions, this way, gradually evolve, based on day-to-day learning from experience.

Unfortunately, most of the race has forgotten how to do this.

Mind Experiment

What do you believe?

List your beliefs on one or several sheets of paper using only the left-hand side of the page. (Or on your laptop or tablet if you prefer. We recommend paper, so you don’t need to bother with formatting, auto-correct, etc.) Use question marks next to any beliefs you’re not sure you fully believe.

If you’re not sure where to start, you might start with beliefs about God, an afterlife, the purpose of life, and what is good and what is bad.

Scientific Method applied to your life—One way

Put yourself on the Witness Stand.

Now also be the Prosecutor cross-examining the Witness. The Witness is about to defend their beliefs (listed in 2a) with evidence.

This means that the Witness looks back at their life to find incidents that prove these beliefs are correct, that they describe reality objectively.

You can start with the beliefs you listed first and work down the page, or put rank-order priority numbers next to the beliefs and then take them in priority order.

“Evidence” means evidence that realistically could be made to stand up in a court of law.

This game can be played in odd moments over the course of a week or more.

What if they said it differently?

This is a game played during life action. It’s played when­ever anybody says anything that upsets you.

What you do is pretend that you are them and realize that you have offended someone. Then you restate the offend­ing words so that they are not offensive.

You might then ask the person if the inoffensive statement of their words was what they meant.

Example:

Other person: “You’re not going to wear that pink tie…?”

You: “You mean, you like some other tie better?”

The point is that specific words trigger emotions based on past associations, but you can change the words to clear out the emotions.

Later, you can clear out the past associations, and then no words can manipulate your emotions.

Unselfish actions pay back better.

In this game, you look into your past to find the most unselfish actions you took and evaluate the results that came from those actions.

You can also do the same for the most selfish actions.

Which paid back better?

Which advisors are conflicting?

This is an experiment to do when you find yourself inter­nally divided as to which way to go in a situation.

You ask yourself:

—What do my thoughts say I should do?

—What do my feelings want to do?

—What does my body want to do?

—What does my intuition say to do?

—What would my father want me to do?

—What would my mother want me to do?

—What did the books I’ve read say to do under these circumstances?

—What does society say you’re supposed to do in this situation?

—What would the person I respect the most do in this situation?

—What would God’s preference be in this situation?

Then, you note which of these advisors conflicts with which.

This pattern of conflict may be a habitual one in your head or may just apply to one type of situation.

Entraining a daily cycle of assimilation and new provisional action decisions

At the end of each day, you relive it before sleep, identify­ing which moments do not fully please you or about which you have some vague lingering concern.

You allow yourself time to contemplate and learn from these moments by taking the role of your own Coach and coaching yourself as to how to play such a moment better in the future.

When you know how to flow through that situation so that it will be no problem next time, i.e., when you have made certain Provisional Action Decisions as to what to try next time, there is a feeling of peace.

If your Provisional Action Decisions do not work out next time, you revise them and keep up this process until every aspect of your life works smoothly.

Then you get bored and get into wider experiences, which produce displeasing moments for which you need to develop new Provisional Action Decisions, i.e., new the­atre, to flow through smoothly.

And a new cycle begins.

Love to all,
Bill

We Are Being Tested

Leave a reply

Welcome to this week’s Bill Harvey Blog.
July 17, 2026

We are being tested the way Job was tested.

It was a setup. Starting way back in the 1960s. As early as the 1960s, as documented by Yoni Applebaum in this month’s issue of The Atlantic, the way that American history was taught in schools bifurcated into two warring narratives. One emphasized the American ideals of what we have always aspired to be, and have generally been, to our own people and in our dealings around the world. The other narrative told it like it was, warts and all, not pulling punches about our imperfections, even as we were getting better year after year.

By 2001, when George W. Bush and Congress created No Child Left Behind, they dodged the bullet on setting a single standard for the teaching of history. The unintended net effect was to virtually mute the teaching of American idealism in schools for the past quarter of a Century. Although the trend toward subordinating American history as a school subject started back in the 1960s.

Can we see any effects that might be traceable to this change in the way schools have taught about what America means and is?

An AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about two-thirds (67%) of U.S. adults say a democratically elected government is highly important to the nation’s identity. Conversely, this means roughly 33% of Americans do not see it as extremely or very important—a significant jump from 2021, when 80% viewed it as highly vital.*

The Generational Divide: Apathy or detachment is heavily concentrated among younger generations. Only 50% of Americans under 30 believe democracy is a key element of the U.S.’s identity, compared to 81% of those ages 60 and older.

Rather than outright hostility toward democracy, experts note that this detachment often stems from a growing belief among everyday citizens—especially younger generations—that the political system is fundamentally broken, corrupt, or simply failing to address their day-to-day problems.

If they had been taught the way the Old Guard had been taught, some of our current problems might never have been possible.

I’m not preaching in favor of whitewashing, but in favor of telling not only all the good and bad details, but also the philosophical drivers for why there is a USA designed the way it is. The ideals, the values, the logic, and reasoning based on deep studies of pre-American history and the types of governing systems there had been and how they fared. The Founders didn’t just make it up. They never claimed that they had received the Light from Above. They had assimilated Enlightenment philosophies and had studied history going as far back as it goes. They debated for 17 years from 1774 to 1791. 17 years to get it right.

And get it right they did. No republic has ever lasted as long as we have.

But loopholes existed. And things that The Founders had warned us against, like the two-party system happened despite their warnings. And the things that Washington said would happen if we went to a two-party system, have now happened big time. The people who felt that their Party was shrinking away found a leader who found those loopholes and has leveraged them. At a time when the schools had pressed the pause button for too long on reminding us of our ideals.

Even when idealism was being taught in schools, we have always, as citizens, not been 100% engaged. Other interests occupied our attention, for most of us, and only a fraction of us (usually around 40%) voted in elections. Socrates, who was all for having a republic, felt that it was a citizen’s duty to serve that republic, might have been shocked to see how lackadaisical the majority of Americans have always been about chipping in some time to serve in the role of engaged citizens.

In the 2024 US presidential election, approximately 85.9 million eligible voters did not cast a ballot. While 2024 tied the highest voter turnout rate in over a century (tied with 1960), the 85.9 million people who sat it out actually outnumbered the total votes cast for either major candidate.

This goes back to the feeling that none of us can do anything to change the inept, corrupt, and distracted from the needs of The People system as it now is. People who don’t vote feel that if they did vote, it would make no difference. As Simon & Garfunkel wrote and sang, “Going to the candidates’ debate, Laugh about it, shout about it, When you’ve got to choose, Every way you look at it, you lose.”

So, we’ve been set up to be tested, prepared by a quarter century of not teaching our own brand of American pragmatic idealism in schools, supported by the most successful governance system in world history and spoiled by it so as to take its benefits and our rights for granted without needing to lift a finger or even vote. And now, if we fail to stand up and be counted, and to vote against the removal of our rights to freedom of speech and assembly, cynicism and low meanness and corruption more blatant than ever before by an order of magnitude, the test will result in a longer period of learning to pass it.

That’s the way that the Universe works. It teaches us things. It first tries teaching it to us in ways that are fun. If we don’t get it, it teaches us with a few hard knocks. If we still don’t get it, the knocks get harder and harder the longer we cling to obstinacy and refusal to open our minds and eyes and see what the Universe is trying to tell us.

As the Father of Our Nation warned us, we might be obstinate because of the two-party system and what it has done to make us feel that the political party we cling to is vital to our personal identity. It is not. Our personal identity is unique in the Universe; it has nothing to do with which teams we root for.

Pass the test. Help us all pass the test. Plan to vote no matter what. Show what you’re made of.

And then when we have retaken our country and are again recognized as the seat of all governing power, “We, The People,” we have some loopholes to fix. In a moment of forgiveness, sometime in the future, we will thank the folks who called those loopholes to our attention so we could fix them before some more talented, more professional, more intelligent baddies come along and find them.

*However, according to a PBS News/NPR/Marist poll released in July 2026, the overwhelming majority of Americans are deeply concerned:

  • 82% of Americans believe that the future of American democracy faces a serious threat.
  • This worry spans across the political spectrum: 74% of Republicans, 83% of independents, and 91% of Democrats share this view.

In that same poll, it was found that 84% of us feel that we know too little about history.

My best wishes to all,
Bill

The Human Heritage: Word Pollution

Leave a reply

Welcome to this week’s Bill Harvey Blog.
July 9, 2026

This is the second in the new MIND MAGIC / MIND EXPERIMENTS book excerpt series. The first one, Release Your Self from the Hypnotic Power of Words, was published on June 5.

 

Humans come into the world. We find out certain things: for example, we find out that fire burns us. This “finding out” we call knowing: when someone has a true picture in his or her mind— “true” meaning that the picture cor­responds to the external reality—we call this knowing. So, if we have a picture in our mind of fire burning our hand, we say that we know that fire can burn us.

So far, language does not yet exist. We can know without language by holding true images in our mind. There is no “believing.” “Believing” comes into the picture when lan­guage is invented.

With language, one person who knows something can pass on this knowledge to another person who has not yet discovered it for themself. The latter person, in accepting the former’s knowledge as true, “believes” it. As we all now know, this “believing” often leads to the holding of untrue pictures in people’s minds.

The cure is to cut down on believing—tend to only hold pictures in one’s mind of the things one has seen oneself.

Belief was never much of an issue before words.

Belief = be lief = be for me. I believe him = he be’s for me on that. He was there. He saw it. He sees it for me. He sees it—I see him see it.

Cosmic humor: Most belief is founded on the form, not the content, of the words believed in.

Disidentifying with the feeling of belief

At almost every instant, you are likely to experience the feeling about a given postulate: “It is so.” Look for that feeling, and when it arises, remind yourself: “It may not be so.” Be willing to act based on your judgment as to whether something is more likely to be true or to be not true; but do not believe that it is either true or not true. In this way, belief is unnecessary to action.

Be especially wary of the feeling of belief at times when you have a thought and then do not contradict it. Simply, the experience of non-contradiction suggests to the belief program that it energizes itself. Thus, you must guard against the tendency to believe any thought you generate. This can best be done by remembering to say to yourself (but not in words), “It may not be so” in response to every thought.

TRUTH - INTELLECTUALLY - ACTIONABLY

The definition of Truth at the intellectual level is what can be made to sound reasonable based on the words you use. Intellectual reason can find some truth and some falsity in every statement, depending upon how it is interpreted.

The definition of Truth at the action level is what works when you actually try it in reality . . . i.e., what the uni­verse reinforces.

We need to make action decisions each second. We need to make intellectual statements a few times a day. The two are usually unrelated.

Few people living in the Scientific Age have realized that the Scientific Method can be applied to Life . . .

Mind Experiment

What do you believe?

List your beliefs on one or several sheets of paper using only the left-hand side of the page. (Or on your laptop or tablet if you prefer. We recommend paper, so you don’t need to bother with formatting, auto-correct, etc.) Use question marks next to any beliefs you’re not sure you fully believe.

If you’re not sure where to start, you might start with beliefs about God, an afterlife, the purpose of life, and what is good and what is bad.

Where did they come from? Why do (did)

I believe that?

In this game, one remem­bers where each belief came from.

Easy if you take them slowly, one at a time.

No longer needing to have beliefs

In this stage, one faces the situation of no longer really having any beliefs, yet realizes that this is true freedom to learn. Often accompanied by brief ecstasy.

It may not be so.

To do this experiment, simply pick a period of time, and in that time watch your thoughts, remembering to realize that each thought might be right or it might be wrong.

This is one of the most universal forms of meditation.

The way it usually goes, you keep getting sucked into iden­tifying with some thought or another and forget to doubt it—then catch yourself and back out of auto-agreement with the thought.

Over time, you begin to see how your idea-generation process, your conviction-decision process, and your other mental processes work. Then you will have control over these processes rather than being controlled by them.

Love to all,
Bill